Discrimination

Okay, today i read a very intresting article in the news about a man from the middle east who sued a company because he didnt get a jobhe was applying for, his reasons were "racism" but what really happend is the following:
The man arrives at the company for an interview there he greets the people who are going to interview him, but one of them is a woman and he wont look her in the eye or shake her hand because its against his religion, so the company decides to not hire him, after which he sues them for 60 grand, and the department who handles racism and discrimination agree, and the man ends up with 60000 bucks and the department that helped him now want the company to hire him.


This has started a media shitstorm in sweden, i think the the man should get deported back to irak or were ever he is from because i seriously cant stand people who move to a country with diffrent norms and then they try to change the norms to the norms of the country they came from >=(

I couldnt post the articlecause its in swedish, but i can translate it for yah =)

okay here is a translated pull out of it (i just ran it through google translate, so it aint perfect)
Okay i dont know how much of this makes sense to you, but you mite get the point? And yes the writer is biassed, she is a woman so she has some quite strong opinions about this subject..

But we have the man in Älmhult that the district court this week gave Skr 60,000 in compensation as an inducement for his sexism. He thinks he should get the job or further compensation from the Employment Service, although he starts with to humiliate a person in the reception committee, by allowing her to stand with outstretched hand, an obvious affront everywhere, and not look into her eyes because she is a woman. Discrimination Ombudsman and the District Court agree with him.

Everyone would see it reasonable that those who refuse to take a black or a Muslim in hand do not get the job. But when God says that the beings of the opposite sex can not be touched has authority, Sweden with him. In South Africa seemed to white also have God on their side when they refused to deal with blacks. Discrimination Ombudsman should, of course, realize and believe that gender apartheid is as unacceptable as color separation.

For DO's own website says: "Welcome to the DO. Discrimination Ombudsman (DO) are working against discrimination related to sex, gender identity or gender expression, ethnicity, religion or other belief, disability, sexual orientation and age. "

Why go where the protection of religion in protecting against sexism? The reason is perhaps to be found in a combination of religiosity that envelops of a diffuse glow of devotion and fragility, which through its INTANGIBILITY creates fear and respect - and the fact that the religious practices of incorporation and generally oppressing women and almost always based on an extremely specific nature of thinking what for sex. This combination has given a spontaneous acceptance for the treatment of women who would never be accepted if it were any other group.

But it can not be commissioned by the government to DO to protect religious practice regardless of the discriminatory ideas doctrine states. Gender equality must prevail over religion when they collide. Prisons sex and gender discrimination should be fought, not supported. One wonders how Sweden could achieve its high level of equality when the authorities do not even understand the value of it, but believe it to be waived as soon as someone with a religious doctrine does not sexist unresistingly may practice their insults.

Rasisters human beings trying to society in various ways to change towards democracy, but for some gudsinspirerades degrading special provisions for and against half of humanity lacking any such ambitions.

Even the man in Älmhult have understood the right to work to change the current norms and values to better suit his ideals. But a bit pragmatic, all people be looking for a livelihood. If the ideological fire in order to make Sweden Saudi Arabia on fire in a heavily indomitable get enough drama when applying for jobs where there are women. Alternatively realize that it becomes difficult to get a job before the fight is won.

The whole thing is just stupid.

I consider myself a tolerant person, but fuck Islam.

1. Politicans are upper class twits
2. Politicans are retarded
3. Islam isnt the real issue because the Koran doesnt say anything about Jihad being diewith honour or that its against the rules to look women in the eye.
4. Religous extremists should have thier arms and legs cut off and then thier mouths stiched together, and after that they should be left in the dessert to rot, because they are the cause for terrorism, hate, and most evil in the world today.

Classic case of exploiting the system.

Lol Sushi, I totally agree about religious extremists.

Also,

Paul Supanich schrieb:

I consider myself a tolerant person

I lol'd for like 20 minutes.

If you are not a religious extremists, then you aren't that religious are you?

I think he is both in the right and the wrong.

I think at the interview he should have said something like:

"I am sorry, it is nothing personal but my religion strongly forbids me to touch and look into the eyes of someone who is not my wife."

Then everything would be all good.

I think he should not have gone for compensation, I think he should have explained his situation alot clearer.

I personally don't follow a religion but I know it is serous stuff, and should not be push aside for any reason, being a job or just going out in public.

Its not his religion but it's him, that guys a deuche.

WarHampster schrieb:

Paul Supanich schrieb:

I consider myself a tolerant person

I lol'd for like 20 minutes.

And I'm the troll? Christ.

Maybe I wouldn't be so harsh if there weren't so many stupid posts like this one or "HAO UNEVURSS WURKS" that use nary the slightest amount of reasoning. Then I get called a troll for shooting down such inane posts? Now I'm the one laughing.

Paul Supanich schrieb:

WarHampster schrieb:

Paul Supanich schrieb:

I consider myself a tolerant person

I lol'd for like 20 minutes.

And I'm the troll?

confidence is key for sucess

Xiphos schrieb:

Its not his religion but it's him, that guys a deuche.

By this post I can see you have little to no knowledge of religions.
All I'm going to say.

Xiphos schrieb:

Its not his religion but it's him, that guys a deuche.

It's fun not having Silver and Gandolf breathing down your neck, isn't it?

Kingraptor14 schrieb:

confidence is key for sucess

Despite your horrible grammar and lack of delivery of this trolling post, I admit you had me when...

...I'm sorry, I just realized: You can't troll.

LEAVE IT TO THE PROFESSIONAL BOY.[/troll]

His religion didn't sue a company for 60,000 dollars.

(not that I don't think there is things wrong with the Islamic culture there are things wrong in all cultures)

totaly, in Islam its the extremist aka those we know as Kurds, terrorists, and Talibans.

But theres also the kristians, like those American missionaries that went to Nigeria (i think) to preach about how dangerous gay people are, and how to cure them, 2 months after they preached Nigeria made laws that made it punishable by death to be gay, and that it also is okay to basicly murder gay people (Nobody gets punished for it...)

Xiphos schrieb:

His religion didn't sue a company for 60,000 dollars.

and? no one said he did.
but his religions that is the reason behind him feeling like he was misstreated(not saying he was.) and that made him decide to sue.
so you saying:

Xiphos schrieb:

Its not his religion but it's him, that guys a deuche.

is just completely wrong.

he might be a generally nice guy, that anyone could get along with, your average joe deep down.
But cause of his religious beleifs we class him as "insane" or "sexist"
and its easy because its not the main religion of the country.

It's not his fault he was raised by that religion.
And again i am not saying that i agree that he should have sued,
I dissagree with the whole suing for $60k.
But still you got to think about his side of things.
His point of view.

Skullking schrieb:

Xiphos schrieb:

His religion didn't sue a company for 60,000 dollars.

and? no one said he did.

So he didn't sue the company for 60,000 dollars?

Yes he did sue, and he won thje case.

Xiphos schrieb:

Skullking schrieb:

Xiphos schrieb:

His religion didn't sue a company for 60,000 dollars.

and? no one said he did.

So he didn't sue the company for 60,000 dollars?

OMFG? are you a retard?

1. First, re-read what your post said.
2. Then re-read what I said.
3. Then re-think what you said.

and if you still think you posted something intelligent.....
Well then... fuck I guess you really are.
Oh and guys don't say "you post stupid as stuff all the time" cause i do it for humour.
and yes i see that i should have said "it" instead of "he"
but thats what happens when you cbf proof reading.

Skullking failed it.

Xiphos is now the best user.

You spelt inteligent wrong...

Xiphos schrieb:

You spelt inteligent wrong...

uhh no i didn't.
Its something called "English Variations"
where in different areas of the world there are different spellings of the word.

Such as "intelligent" and inteligent"
also "humor" and humour"
and my personal favourite
"favourite" and "favorite"

I myself live in NZ were our rules of spelling are that of traditional English.

Haha very punny!

actually, the correct english is indeed intelligent.
sorry to fail you, Xiphos.

My I-pod... was... wrong. ...